Wednesday, June 03, 2026

HUNGRY (2026)—REVIEW

Hungry (2026), written and directed by James Nunn, is an entertaining and novel twist on the animal attack genre. Great white sharks I’m used to. Oversized alligators, sure. Giant anaconda even. But a hippotamus? How implausimus! From top to bottomus! And yet Nunn’s implausible premise of a killer hippo on the rampage in the Louisiana bayou is nothing more than a creative stretch of the imagination from an all-but-forgotten historical fact. 

In 1910, Louisiana Congressman Robert F. Broussard introduced the “American Hippo Bill” (H.R. 23261) to authorize the importation and release of hippos into the swamps. The ambitious, albeit bizarre, plan aimed to accomplish two goals. First, it intended to solve a national meat shortage. Hippos would serve as an alternative, free-ranging livestock source, offering meat some promoters jokingly called “lake cow bacon”. Second, hippos were expected to consume the choking, invasive water hyacinths that were ruining local fishing and boat navigation. 

Despite strong backing from conservationists, military spies, President Theodore Roosevelt and the U.S. Department of Agriculture—let alone a glowing editorial in the New York Times (who promised their readers “delicious. hyacinth-fed hippopotamus of Louisiana's lily-fringed streams”)—the legislation ultimately failed to pass. Instead of importing hippos, the U.S. Department of Agriculture opted to resolve meat shortages by expanding traditional cattle ranching and domestic beef production. 

But such a story invites a “what if?”, as laid out in articles for the Smithsonian and Wired, and in Nunn’s innovative appropriation of these details to deliver a straightforward treatment—with refreshingly little irony—of an animal attack unlike anything genre buffs have seen to date. A killer hippo has been long overdue.  

Hungry’s opening sequence shows a large alligator aptly named Big Ben sporting a tracking device being abruptly devoured by something even larger in the water. We know it’s the hippopotamus but we don’t see it very well. In fact, the hippo is only hinted at for the first half of the movie, which speaks to remarkable restraint of special effects on the part of the filmmakers. Instead, we’re introduced to our ensemble and reasonable effort is spent developing their characters. 

Veteran actor Joaquim de Almeida as Walker is the film’s seasoned harbinger of doom, the owner of a bayou touring company. Rodrigo (Michel Curiel) is a tour guide in Walker’s employ who organizes an outing with two sister friends Sistine (Madison Davenport) and Hannah (Olivia Bernstone), a family trio made up of grandfather Tim (Jim Meskimen), his daughter Sally (Samantha Coughlin) and her son Mikey (River Codack), and a selfish black businesswoman Dionne (Tracey Bonner) who’s the character you love to hate. Dionne bribes Rodrigo with a large tip to take the group to a remote area of the bayou to photograph the legendary Big Ben; but, they only find his carcass unexpectedly ripped in half. Just as they start to ask, “What did that?”, their boat is attacked and capsized, and they’re thrown into the water. Panic ensues and survival becomes the driving force of the film from then on, interrupted now and then by maudlin scenes of desperation as one by one they’re knocked off by the hippo. We get to know each character just enough to feel bad for them when they die, which is the point of course. It adds a hint of tragedy to the inevitable formula. 

Cinematographer Job Reineke does a good job of keeping his camera level with the surface of the water or slightly below looking up through the water so that one feels the palpable threat of the hippo being somewhere nearby. Interstitial shots of the swamp itself visualize the indifferent beauty of the bayou, which in its own way becomes a character. 

When the hippo finally does appear in its fully glory it is a hefty horrific beast and is surprisingly believable. After most of the cast has been done away with, the film begins to slow down to a rumination on motherhood. Sistine harbors guilt over not having been able to properly care for her ailing mother and suffers from feeling that she is a failure altogether, not able to keep a minimum wage job and in fear of losing her home. Surviving one onslaught from the hippo after another strengthens her character as she maneuvers her way to becoming final girl. Davenport delivers a sympathetic performance that serves as ballast. 

Early on in Hungry, Walker serves as harbinger in describing how dangerous hippos can be when provoked, able to kill easily with their huge jaws; but hippos are herbivores so their motivation is not hunger as the film’s title suggests, or if they are hungry it’s more a blood lust to kill anything that intrudes into its territory. Their only conscience, Walker suggests, is about protecting their young, which Sistine understands and uses. By doing so she relieves some of the guilt she feels over her own mother. It’s a bit of an overwrought ending but doesn’t in any way take away from the film’s generous and entertaining action.

 

BACKROOMS (2026)—REVIEW

The psyche, in considering itself, is architectural and both irreal and surreal in how it configures spatiality, let alone remembers it. This is the unsettling focus of Backrooms (2026), the debut feature-length film by genre sensation Kane Parsons based on his YouTube creepypasta of the same name. 

A creepypasta is a short, user-generated horror story designed to frighten readers and widely shared across the internet. The term is a mashup of "creepy" and "copypasta," referencing the early days of digital culture when spooky text was repeatedly copied and pasted across forums and message boards.  

Elevating his creepypasta to a full-length feature has enhanced Parson’s initial concept with a claustrophobic yet ever-expanding production design by Danny Vermette who worked alongside set designer Alan Derksen and lead dresser Cheyanne Reinelt to physically bring the viral online universe to the big screen. A realtor might assert, “Location, location, location!” but would be hard-pressed to sell this property. 

Mashing together the oneiric set pieces of Charlie Kaufman with the uncomfortable and ambiguous imperatives of David Lynch and the complicated canted angles of Heinrich Emigholz to horrific and provocative effect, Backrooms plunders genre tropes and psychological theories to construct an admirably threatening environment allegiant to its internet origins.  

Backrooms is surreal in how it seeks to visualize the connection between dreams / nightmares and the psyche, but irreal in how it posits that what we consider real—including the presumed positive effects of psychotherapy—might not be real at all. Swiss psychotherapist C.G. Jung often used an architectural metaphor—specifically a house or a multi-story building—to conceptualize the structure of dreams and the human psyche. Rather than viewing dreams as deceptive trickery, he treated them as finished, natural constructions that mirror the deepest layers of the mind. His own dream recorded early in his autobiography Memories, Dreams and Reflections marks his descent through architectural layers by way of doors and stairways, starting with familiar furnishings, passing through ancient trappings, and veering into the prehistoric and near primordial.  

“I was in a house I did not know, which had two storeys,” Jung writes. “It was ‘my house.’ I found myself in the upper storey, where there was a kind of salon furnished with fine old pieces in Rococo style. On the walls hung a number of precious old paintings. I wondered that this should be my house and thought ‘not bad.’ But then it occurred to me that I did not know what the lower floor looked like. Descending the stairs, I reached the ground floor. There everything was much older. I realized that this part of the house must date from about the fifteenth or sixteenth century. The furnishings were mediaeval, the floors were of red brick. Everywhere it was rather dark. I went from one room to another thinking ‘now I really must explore the whole house.’ I came upon a heavy door and opened it. Beyond it, I discovered a stone stairway that led down into a cellar. Descending again, I found myself in a beautifully vaulted room which looked exceedingly ancient. Examining the walls, I discovered layers of brick among the ordinary stone blocks, and chips of brick in the mortar. As soon as I saw this, I knew that the walls dated from Roman times. My interest by now was intense. I looked more closely at the floor. It was of stone slabs and in one of these I discovered a ring. When I pulled it, the stone slab lifted and again I saw a stairway of narrow stone steps leading down to the depths. These, too, I descended and entered a low cave cut into rock. Thick dust lay on the floor and in the dust were scattered bones and broken pottery, like remains of a primitive culture. I discovered two human skulls, obviously very old, and half disintegrated. Then I awoke.” (MDR, pp. 158-159) 

Cinematographer Jeremy Cox masterfully simulates this layered descent in one of the later scenes of Backrooms, which articulates the experiences of Mary, the psychotherapist played by Renate Reinsve whose marketing strategy is to promise analysands that she will help them go through windows into better lives. The inspiration for that promise seems to have come from her agoraphobic mother’s refusal to let her open the windows of her childhood home. After her mother is institutionalized, Mary pursues a career in psychotherapy in an effort, perhaps, to make sense of the past, though she seems at the same time unwilling to let go of it. In an early scene Mary’s mother encourages her to press her hand into wet cement. What seems like a lovely memory is literally buried underneath a pile of debris from their demolished house being dumped on them. From that origin memory Mary has salvaged the chunk of concrete on which her handprint is impressed. 

This triggered a deep memory within me. When I was 7-8, I attended Myron D. Witter elementary in Brawley, California. I walked a long distance from the school to our home on the edge of town, this side of the railroad tracks. One afternoon, shortly before turning onto “H” Street where I lived, I found a roadside curb of fresh cement and pushed my little hand into it. I often looked at it whenever I walked by, proud of my mark on the world. Over the years I have thought about that handprint often and have even wondered if it would still be there should I ever return to Brawley and, if so, if I could also carry it away as a memento? Perhaps it would come in handy, as it does for Mary in Backrooms

I admire Reinsve’s risk in shifting from an arthouse film like Joachim Trier’s Oscar®-winning Sentimental Value (2026) to a genre film like Backrooms

As frustrated architect Clark, Chiwetel Ejiofor delivers an energized performance of a bewildered and unmoored man who discovers a dimension that proves his architectural prowess even as it confirms his unwillingness to transform trauma, preferring to wallow in the comfort of not changing, of not becoming anyone else, of remaining rooted in an uncanny familiarity. He befriends the denizens of his own depths. He feeds off of them. 

The answer to Mary’s final question, “What’s going to happen to me?” is deeply disturbing and ambiguous. We’re captured in her question. What’s going to happen to all of us? 

Within the ranks of new genre experiments, along with Curry Barker’s Obsession (2025), Backrooms reanimates the genre through an electricity that courses through assembled tropes that have been reconstructed into a new body. It’s a satisfying generational shift that feels like a shot in the arm for an enthusiast such as myself.

 

Monday, June 01, 2026

CAROLINA CAROLINE (2025)—REVIEW

Being “on the lam” originates from late 19th-century criminal slang. By the 1880s, American pickpockets used the word as a slang verb to mean "running away" or "getting out of the way" when police were near. Adding “lovers” to the verb introduced the cinematic trope of fugitive couples fleeing from the law driven by amor fati and fueled by the romance of crime. 

As early as 1918, Swedish pioneer Victor Sjöström adapted Johann Sigurjonsson’s drama into the silent film The Outlaw and his Wife, long considered “the most beautiful film in the world” because of its illicit passion between an Icelandic outlaw and a landowning widow. Escaping social scrutiny, the lovers take off to the hills, weather several adventures, and finally freeze to death in a frosted embrace while the intertitles claim: “Death forgave them. The only law for them was their love.” This comports with the adage that Love throws Death off its scent, even if only for a short while. 

Each generation revives that poetic doomed chase, of course, death hot on the heels of love, and various listicles rank their five favorites, or ten, or twenty-five “lovers on the lam” films. Those choices span decades of film history, often with connective tissue such as Fritz Lang’s precursor film noir You Only Live Once (1937), said to have inspired Nicholas Ray’s noir classic They Live By Night (1948), based on Edward Anderson's Depression-era novel Thieves Like Us (1937). Robert Altman likewise adapted Anderson’s novel in 1974 using the original title of the novel.  

You Only Live Once also inspired Godard’s Pierrot le fou (1965) and, of course, Bonnie and Clyde (1967), Arthur Penn’s highly fictionalized and historically inaccurate recount of Depression-era outlaws Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow. A critical and commercial success, Bonnie and Clyde revived interest in the duo and romanticized their criminality. Earlier, William Witney had directed The Bonnie Parker Story (1958), which was more of a Grade-B exploitation film distributed to drive-ins on a double-bill with Roger Corman’s Machine Gun Kelly (1958). In 2019, John Lee Hancock depicted the manhunt for the public enemies from the point of view of the pursing lawmen in the Netflix film The Highwaymen (2019)

Which leads to the most recent lovers on the lam film Carolina Caroline (2025) directed by Adam Carter Rehmeier, written by William Thomas Dean IV, and starring Samara Weaving and Kyle Gallner, with a scene-stealing abrasive supporting turn by Kyra Sedgwick. With a 100% aggregate score at Rotten Tomatoes, Carolina Caroline has everything you would want from the genre. Chemistry is key and casting is stellar in that regard. Weaving and Gallner rival the sensuous conflicted energy of Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty in Bonnie and Clyde, Farley Granger and Cathy O’Donnell in They Live By Night, Peggy Cummins and John Dall in Gun Crazy (1950), Sissy Spacek and Martin Sheen in Badlands (1973), Christian Slater and Patricia Arquette in True Romance (1993), Brad Pitt and Juliette Lewis in Kalifornia (1993) and on and on. It is essential that the lovers identify within their criminality the sense that their love is all they have against a world determined to beat them down. They resist for as long as they can. They escape the ordinary if even for just a few months of the extraordinary. Weaving and Gallner steam up the screen together, exciting, incendiary, compulsive. 

Samara Weaving as Caroline excels as a young woman desperate to join the world and to escape her small town existence as a gas station attendant, brazen in her desire to hunt out a mother who abandoned her as a child to determine if she is anything like her. She seeks to situate herself in a dangerous quest for self-awareness, gambling with moral parameters. Is she, as she questions herself, a good person pretending to be bad or a bad person pretending to be good? A childhood of deprivation compels her to want more than she’s ever had and arguably more than she should ever have. In acting out a need to take from the world, to short change it, her passion accelerates beyond control, tragedy ensues, and Weaving reveals a woman whose self-destruction is marbled with a vulnerable naïveté, especially when the consequences of her actions set in and her fantasies collapse. 

Kyle Gallner as Oliver, the guy who fatefully walks into her gas station, is Caroline’s charming and experienced guide, in love with and protective of Caroline’s efforts to discover herself, and unwilling or unable to stop their mutually-assured self-destruction. Harkening back to 1918, the only law for Caroline and Oliver is their love. Their romance is erotic, the pace of their crime spree thrilling, and the psychological authenticity of their star-crossed passion drives this road trip to its poignant and explosive conclusion.

  

Should Carolina Caroline leave you wanting more of the genre, here’s what I would suggest:  

The Outlaw and His Wife (1918)  

The 39 Steps (1935)  

You Only Live Once (1937)  

Obsessione (1943)  

They Live By Night (1948)  

Gun Crazy (1950)  

Where Danger Lives (1950)  

The Fast and the Furious (1955)  

The Bonnie Parker Story (1958)  

The Sadist (1963)  

Breathless (1963) / Breathless (1983)  

Pierrot Le Fou (1965)  

Bonnie and Clyde (1967)  

The Honeymoon Killers (1970)  

Zabriske Point (1970)  

The Getaway (1972) / The Getaway (1994)  

Boxcar Bertha (1972)  

The Rendezvous (1972)  

Badlands (1973)  

Dirty Mary Crazy Larry (1974)  

The Sugarland Express (1974)  

Thieves Like Us (1974) 

Something Wild (1986)  

Drugstore Cowboy (1989)  

Wild at Heart (1990)  

Thelma & Louise (1991)  

My Own Private Idaho (1991)  

One False Move (1991)  

The Living End (1992)  

Guncrazy (1992)  

True Romance (1993)  

Kalifornia (1993)  

Teenage Bonnie and Klepto Clyde (1993)  

Natural Born Killers (1994)  

River of Grass (1994)  

Love and a .45 (1994)  

The Doom Generation (1995)  

Butterfly Kiss (1995)  

Mad Love (1995)  

A Life Less Ordinary (1997)  

Heaven’s Burning (1997)  

Criminal Lovers (1999)  

Burnt Money (2000)  

Tengri (2008)  

God Bless America (2011)  

Sightseers (2012)  

Sun Don’t Shine (2012)  

Shangri-la Suite (2016)  

Racer and the Jailbird (2017)  

Queen & Slim (2019)  

The Bride! (2026)